INFRAMAG for the future transport
Guideline values for the different modes of transport will be the basis for the calculations made and comparisons between different destinations. It is not a scientific report but can give a quick idea of the energy consumption and a comparison between the modes of transport. It may not be what everyone thinks and the impression you get in the press
Compilation of energy consumption per passenger
Transportation options | X 2000 | Intercity tåg | Ordinary passenger train | Tesla | InfraMag train |
Energy consumption/person | 0,73 kWh | 0,8 kWh | 1,2 kWh | 1 passenger 2 kWh
4 passenger 0,5 kWh |
0,05 - 0,12 kWh |
CO2 emissions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Other emissions | No | No | No | Fine health-hazardous particles from, among other things, the rubber wheels | No |
The above figures show that Tesla's choice as an environmental alternative is no better than what the train provides. If you add to that that there are other environmentally dangerous emissions from Tesla, such as the fine particles that come from the contact of the rubber wheels with the road surface and the dangerous microparticles that are spread, then Tesla is not the environmental argument that is spread by the press.
This site was created with the Nicepage